junkyardjesus: (cheerful)
Aramiya Satoshi ([personal profile] junkyardjesus) wrote2012-02-09 11:34 pm
Entry tags:

CFUW team post!

Okay, here's a place we can talk without anyone noticing. We can talk about strategies here, where the wolves aren't likely to hear us.
prodigious: ((unsure))

[personal profile] prodigious 2012-02-12 08:10 pm (UTC)(link)
I suppose we'll have to be quick, then.
prodigious: (DEEP THOUGHTS)

[personal profile] prodigious 2012-02-13 12:39 am (UTC)(link)
It looks like Leo and Crow are the safe sheep.
prodigious: (DEEPER THOUGHTS)

[personal profile] prodigious 2012-02-13 12:53 am (UTC)(link)
And I've gone ahead and set up a post here.
prodigious: (ahaha well i am very prodigious)

[personal profile] prodigious 2012-02-13 01:50 am (UTC)(link)
- either way, dinner's about to come out of the oven, so if you get back to this before I do and you think we should do it, go ahead and take care of it without me!
prodigious: (.......smile and nod)

[personal profile] prodigious 2012-02-13 02:22 am (UTC)(link)
I'm back, sorry about that!

Are we going to take them up on how we place our vote, or are we rejecting it?
prodigious: (DEEP THOUGHTS)

[personal profile] prodigious 2012-02-13 02:30 am (UTC)(link)
I'm a little worried about having the safe sheep decide to tell people we're wolves, but you're right. I suppose we can always unlock our posts if we're on the spot again and let people decide what they will based on that.

I...am uncertain, honestly. I find Tiffany and Nita least suspicious, because their missing two suspicion votes so far is giving up an excellent opportunity to control who goes up to vote. The first day, the votes were split 4-4-3 at the end; no matter who the wolf was, they could have brought us up to four and then it would've been a coinflip, which at least has a chance of keeping the wolf out. Because they didn't, the wolf definitely went up when they could've protected them. I can't see a wolf letting that chance pass.

The second suspicion vote, it wouldn't matter much if Laguna and Sanosuke were indeed the wolves, because they would've been up regardless. But the other two teams tied, so if we didn't get a wolf that day, they again could've controlled who went up and kept a wolf off the block entirely.

But I'm torn between the other two. I find Parker slightly more suspicious than Lambdadelta, but I don't have anything solid to back that up, honestly - so I feel that I could very easily be wrong about it.
prodigious: (DEEPEST THOUGHTS)

[personal profile] prodigious 2012-02-13 02:44 am (UTC)(link)
Admittedly, that's been bothering me too. If they had reason to believe the vote was going to go that way, then I could see jumping on it quickly so they don't look suspicious by voting later, but that is a rather large "if," and the fact that Sanosuke and Laguna were leading in suspicion doesn't ensure that the voting is going to go straight for them, either.

I could see them offering up a teammate as a sacrifice, but it'd be risky to do it if they didn't already have reason to believe the ousting was going to be a lost cause anyway.
prodigious: (DEEP THOUGHTS)

[personal profile] prodigious 2012-02-13 02:52 am (UTC)(link)
I'm fine with that, although our vote won't be enough to get them into ousting unless someone else switches. Would you like to do the honors?
prodigious: (DEEPER THOUGHTS)

[personal profile] prodigious 2012-02-13 03:01 am (UTC)(link)
And then there's the question of our ousting vote.
prodigious: (ahaha well i am very prodigious)

[personal profile] prodigious 2012-02-13 03:10 am (UTC)(link)
And seeing your question to the game as a whole...should I be ready to unlock that post with Crow and Leo?
prodigious: (DEEP THOUGHTS)

[personal profile] prodigious 2012-02-13 03:48 am (UTC)(link)
Looks like Rika just voted on Tiffany and Nita, so since we were leaning towards voting on Parker anyway...shall I go cast that?
prodigious: (DEEPEST THOUGHTS)

[personal profile] prodigious 2012-02-13 04:09 am (UTC)(link)
Right. That could be tough. She's pretty good at this.

(no subject)

[personal profile] prodigious - 2012-02-13 05:23 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] prodigious - 2012-02-14 01:36 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] prodigious - 2012-02-14 21:08 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] prodigious - 2012-02-14 21:15 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] prodigious - 2012-02-14 21:28 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] prodigious - 2012-02-14 21:38 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] prodigious - 2012-02-14 21:53 (UTC) - Expand